I've been doing most JHBuild development in my bzr branch recently. If you have bzr 0.8rc1 installed, you can grab it here:
bzr branch http://www.gnome.org/~jamesh/bzr/jhbuild/jhbuild.dev
I've been keeping a regular CVS import going at
http://www.gnome.org/~jamesh/bzr/jhbuild/jhbuild.cvs using Tailor, so
changes people make to module sets in CVS make there way into the bzr
branch. I've used a small hack so that merges back into CVS get
recorded correctly in the
- Apply the diff between
jhbuild.devto my CVS checkout and commit.
- Modify tailor to pause before committing the to
- While tailor is paused, run
bzr revertfollowed by a merge of the same changes from
- Let tailor complete the commit.
It's a bit of a hack, but it allows me to do repeated merges from the CVS import to my development branch (and back again). It also means that any file moves I do in my bzr branch are reflected in the CVS import when merged.
So now when filing bug reports on jhbuild, you can submit fixes in the form of bzr branches as well as patches.
So, on to the improvements:
Generic Version Control Interface
Previously, to add support for a new version control system the following additions were needed:
- Some code to invoke the version control utility to make checkouts and update working trees.
- Code to implement the build state machine for modules using the
version control system (these classes would generally derive from
AutogenModulewhich implemented most of the build logic).
- Code to create instances of the above module type when parsing
This was quite a bit of work, and in the end would only help if the code
in question was set up to build the same way as most Gnome modules (i.e.
autogen.sh script and autotools). If you wanted to build a
module using Python distutils out of Subversion, a new module type would
be needed. If you wanted to build a
distutils module from a
tarball, that would be another module type again.
With the new system, the different version control support modules provide a common interface. This means that a single module type is capable of implementing the build state machine for any version control system. Similarly, it should now be possible to implement distutils module support such that it will work with any supported version control system.
This work is not yet finished though. A bit more work needs to be done
to parse version control system agnostic module definitions from
.modules files. When this is done, a fair bit of the current syntax
can be deprecated and eventually removed. When this is done, adding
support for a new version control system shouldn't take more than
Module Type Simplifications
As well as reducing the number of module types that need to be
maintained in JHBuild, I've been working on simplifying the code in
these module types. Previously, each stage of a module build was
represented by a method call on the module type. The return value of the
method was used to say (a) whether the stage succeeded or not, (b) what
the next state would be and (c) if an error occurred some alternative
next states to go to (e.g. offer to rerun
With the new system, the next state and error states are declared as attributes on the method object. The method can indicate a failure by raising a particular exception. This greatly simplifies the cases where a build stage involves a number of separate actions that could each fail individually, since the exception cuts processing short without the error checks getting in the way of the code.
There are still a few module build stages not converted to the new system since their next state depends on various config settings (e.g. if running "make check" has been enabled or not). Since these generally involve skipping a stage based on some criteria, the plan is to move the logic to the stage being skipped, which should simplify things further.
So, would "build Debian packages" also work as a jhbuild module? Basically, take dist tarball, rename to appropriate .orig.tar.gz name, copy in debian directory, call dpkg-source to make diff and dsc, call pdebuild with various arguments to make debs, possibly needing to make previous debs available to pbuilder as build-depends for subsequent debs.
Also, do you have GIT support planned?
James Henstridge -
Anonymous #1: you could probably do up a module type in jhbuild to help with building debian packages. Hopefully the changes I'm making should make this easier if you decide to do such a modification.
Anonymous #2: already committed, and being used for "cairo" in the gnome-2.16 module set.
Since jhbuild supports Arch as a module source, is baz also supported?
Also, is SCons supported as a module type?
James Henstridge -
JHBuild supports modules that use Arch for version control by using the baz-1.x client.
There is no support for modules stored in bzr yet, partly because I was waiting for 0.8 to come out -- the new checkout feature feels like the best option for jhbuild setups.
There is no support for the scons build tool at this point, but the refactoring should make it possible to add support in such a way that it will work with all supported version control systems (cvs, subversion, darcs, git, arch and tarballs). Previously you'd end up writing a fair bit of boilerplate to support all the VC backends.
Thanks for the reply. (I did mean bzr [not baz] in my first question.)
Looking forward to the new refactoring.